Months ago, the Principle Voices website changed servers and has been going through some changes. I've been slowly adding material to it again, most of which used to be there but somehow went missing when the leap from server to server occurred. Today, I found an old speech I gave at a rally in Salt Lake in 2001. Thought you might find it interesting:
Comments given by Mary Batchelor at the Religious Freedom Rally on the Utah Capitol steps
June 16, 2001
My name is Mary Batchelor. I consider myself an involuntary monogamist. I am currently married to a man I love and admire, and we hope to enter into plural marriage again in the future.
I am one of the co-authors of Voices in Harmony, Contemporary Women Celebrate Plural Marriage. Yes, I said “celebrate.” One hundred women responded to our request to join their voices to ours in writing this book, to let the world know that we love our husbands, we love our sister-wives, we love our children, and we love our polygnyous family arrangement.
Why? It is a deeply sacred part of our religion, so thoroughly permeating the foundation of our beliefs that without polygyny, the promises of our religion fall short. We believe that women can find independence, fulfillment, and even empowerment within polygyny.
I am here today because our families are being threatened. Our religious beliefs and choice of lifestyle have been ridiculed, villified, condemned and proclaimed criminal in a public campaign that has already led to a socially acceptable and openly hostile form of McCarthyism. Declarations that polygmy must be eradicated are akin to ethnic cleansing and are a direct violation of the civil rights of consenting adults to arrange their families as they see fit.
It is ironic that this is occurring in a state and country founded upon religious freedom.
Yet, in America, polygamists are not afforded the rights and protections of the First Amendment to the Constitution.
For us, and many other minorities, religious freedom has never been fully realized in America.
In order for all Americans to truly enjoy the freedom to practice our religion according to the dictates of our conscience, we must grant that same freedom to others, whether or not we agree with them or approve of their beliefs or actions. It doesn’t matter if we belong to a majority religion, a minority religion, or no religion at all, we must find a way to appreciate diversity of thought and opinion. Toleration means nothing if we only tolerate those people with whom we agree.
We applaud the state of Utah for welcoming the Dalai Lama, and ask, can we not offer that same kind of welcome and respect to those who live in our own backyards?
It should no longer be acceptable to violate the rights of polygamous people. It is time to revise oppressive laws, and remove archaic statutes from the books. It is not the place of government to dictate which religion is acceptable or not, neither is it the place of government to dictate to adults how they can arrange their families.
We want laws to protect our families, not oppress them. We want laws to protect our children, not deprive them. Polygamous families should not be forced to live in fear; unsure of how much they can reveal about themselves publicly, to their neighbors, teachers or doctors, for fear they might be turned in to law enforcement and charged with bigamy or unlawful cohabitation, for nothing more than living polygamously. Polygamous families should not be made to live in silence, suffering public ridicule and slander from those who want to impose their values upon the rest of society. Polygamous families should not be compelled to withdraw from society to protect themselves or their children from persecution, animosity and hatred. They should have equal access to public assistance in times of need, to adequate medical care for their children, to employment, housing and even recreation, like any other family.
We are not asking for special treatment. On the contrary, we are asking for equal treatment.
The majority of polygamists do not commit incest, welfare fraud or other offenses. The majority of polygamists are law-abiding, industrious people who are not criminals, but loving spouses and parents. We are entitled to be treated as such.
In closing, I offer the words of Distinguished Professor of Psychology, Irwin Altman, of the University of Utah, and Professor of Social and Cultural Anthropology, Joseph Ginat, of the University of Haifa, in Israel, from their book, Polygamous Families in Contemporary Society, p. 444:
“In spite of the problems they face, some of these new forms of close relationships — including plural families among contemporary Mormon fundamentalists — are here to stay in American and Western society. They are not likely to ‘go away’; they are not fads or fancies; they are not aberrations. They will be part of the family life scene well into the future.
“We must therefore learn about them, learn from them, and even help people live the lifestyle of their choice. Doing so increases the probability that participants in emerging forms of close relationships will contribute to the well-being and equality of life in American society at large. Not doing so, and viewing these family lifestyles as inherently immoral, wrong, and unacceptable, increases the probability that American society will fragment, with a declining sense of community and civility in our public and private lives.”
Monday, April 20, 2009
Principle Voices Website Updated
Labels:
Mary Batchelor,
polygamy,
polygyny,
Principle Voices,
Voices in Harmony
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
visit Coram Non Judice,
go there and you will understand why we hate plygs and also why they haven't earned nor deserve the civil rights that the rest of us law abiding citizens take for granted.
I've been to his site. His site has nothing to do with "polygamists" in general.
There are a good number of law-abiding families who live polygamously and honor their families and their neighbors. These families are no less deserving of fairness and justice than monogamous families, or single-parent families.
I must confess to some confusion when you refer to the "rest of us law abiding citizen". I know there are monogamists (or shall I say non-polygamists?) who are law abiding but there are many, many who are not. Having worked with service providers for many years, I'm well aware of the dynamics of domestic violence and abuse, and the prevalence of both in larger society.
I prefer NOT to draw the line between monogamists and everyone else, because the truth is, it does not matter whether a person is married, living with someone outside of marriage, living in polygamy, or is single, rich or poor, societal problems such as abuse, domestic violence, crime, etc., infiltrate every segment of humanity.
Abuse crosses all socio-economic lines. There is NO culture free of problems. There is NO segment of society that is free of problems.
Take a cross section of any neighborhood, and you will find a percentage of abuse, victims of crimes, pregnant teens, etc.
Our jails are full of those who consider themselves "the rest of us", if you insist on dividing people into two camps, the polygs and the monogs.
At the same time, I don't understand any justification for "hatred" of "plygs". Hating polygamists means that you are hating a lot of kind-hearted, decent, caring, compassionate, loving people. Hating hurts innocents who fall prey to stereotyping, guilt by association (do YOU want to be condemned for something your neighbor or you pastor or your fellow church attendee has done?). Hating hurts polygamous children. Do you WANT to drive them out of public school? There are many children of polygamous families who attend public school, but who are subject to bullying, ridicule and abuse from other kids and even adults who HATE polygamy.
Hatred of polygamists translates into job loss, neighborhood harassment, gossip, rumor-mongering, name-calling, bullying, vandalism, crimes against polygamous people justified by "the law"...
From my interaction with TXBluesMan (the admin of Corum Non Judice), I don't believe that he would countenance crimes committed against polygamists, be it polygamous parents or their children.
Beautiful Speech
Thank-you so much
Mary,
Sorry for the late response, but to be truthful, I just didn't notice this post until now.
First, despite the comments of Anon 9:06, my blog is not designed as a haven, nor is it intended to encourage those that hate polygamists. There are some that post there that do apparently hate 'plygs' (to use the term that they tend to use, and which I use very sparingly, if at all), but that is not the case for a vast majority of the visitors.
Second, you are correct that my blog is not dedicated to polygamy, nor the FLDS, although both have appeared frequently.
Third, crimes committed against anyone, and most especially children, should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. That would include any crimes committed against polygamists in general or the FLDS in particular. No one heard me jump up and state that Wyler should be given a pass (or for that matter Wisan). If they violated the law, there are consequences, and they have to face those.
I don't care about polygamy one way or another, but I have made it abundantly clear that at the present time it is a criminal offense in all 50 states, and that those that decide to live in a polygamous marriage may be held to account for that crime. For that reason, I disagree with part of your speech ("polygamists are law abiding" - they are in fact not, by definition, due to their polygamy), but salute you for working within the system to change laws that you disagree with.
Finally, everyone has the right to be treated within the boundaries of the law and the constitution. While there are differences of opinion of those and their applicability to a particular situation, it is not appropriate to focus on the beliefs of a religious group as a basis for prosecution. Actions (such as bigamy) are the only thing that the law should look at.
Post a Comment